How Much does Christina Hendricks Weigh?

I have to disagree. First off most women lie about their weight so quite a few people are surprised when they see a woman closer to the 200lb mark that doesn’t look like a hippo. I believe her weight to be between 170 and 180. First she’d 5″8 and has a 38DDD bust size. I am a tall curvey girl also I am 5″9 and have a 36 D bust. Her measurements are listed as 46-32-44. Mine are 44-33-44 and I weigh 180. I am always honest with people about my weight and most people are absolutely floored when i tell them i weigh that much. Also compare her to other women around her height and weight. Ex: Tyra Banks has said that at the height of her modeling career with victoria secret she weighed 154 lbs and she is 5″10. Christina Hendricks, while not fat, is still much larger that tyra was, espically throught the hips and chest. Serena williams is 5″9 and weighs 150 but she’s still much smaller that Hendricks. While her waist is slim her hips and chest are huge, you really have to take these areas into account. When you look at her you think her chest and hips are awesome, not unsightly, yet they are still covered in fat, probably most of the fat on her body is in these two places.

I am a woman of 5’9″ and 154 pounds and would say her weight is approximately 150 pounds! She’s picture perfect in height and weight–Hollywood should take notice! Statistically, in America she is skinny.

I have to agree with Hailey above. Christina Hendricks is beautiful, but she doesn’t weigh 154. I would put her more between 165-170.

She is 100% definitely higher than 150… Probably 160-170

I’m 5’9 and 117 lbs. I’m the hottest bitch on the block! All y’all other bitches are fat, just sayin’.

i think that weight sounds about right, but she could be 155-175. i am 5’9″, and when i am around 155-165 lbs i have the same size waist, arms, etc. that she has (although slightly smaller boobs). don’t let the big boobs and curvy hips fool you — she has a trim waist, thin face and lean limbs. but at more than 175lbs, she would probably start to have a belly pooch , her arms would be thicker and her face would be thicker (with a little double chin starting when photos are in profile). remember also that the camera really does add at least 10 lbs, so whatever your guess you need to subtract that…i would have guessed 165, so 155 sounds spot on!

Agreeing with most of the ladies here…I would guess she is between 155-165. Bear in mind things like, muscle (which is smaller and more dense) weighs more than fat, so Serena Williams is smaller because she is very muscular.

Everyone holds their weight differently. I, for instance, am 5’2″ and weigh 160-165, 38 large C, have very muscular legs and am about a size 12. Some of the folks responding here should stop being so critical.

I agree.. she is way more than a D cup. DD at the very least.

Regardless of what Christina Hendricks weight is, she has a beautiful & curvy (NOT FAT) figure.

She weighs more than 154 lbs… I would put her around 170. I am 5’6″, 145 lbs… 34C… size 8. Her boobs alone would put her at least 10+ lbs. heavier than me. Plus her waist and hips are larger and she’s taller. Not to mention, depending on how much muscle she has, it could be even more since muscle weighs more than fat. And I agree with most of the women on here… ladies lie about their weight all the time! Who cares if you asked ladies on the street with a similar figure… if some stranger came up to me and asked how much I weighed, I would shave at least 10 lbs. off the truth and they would believe me because I don’t look like I weigh 145…

Don, you are an idiot. Jessica is right… if you know girls that are 5’7″ and 110lbs… you should suggest some weight gaining shakes or something. That height and weight would mean they are extremely malnourished.

At any rate, Christina is awesome and a great role model for all of the normal-sized women out there. That’s right… she’s normal! I don’t see why it’s such a big deal that someone in Hollywood isn’t a skeleton.

I’m a 36C, 5’7 and 2/3,and I weigh 155lbs. I am smaller than Christina. However,I have a good deal of muscle as I weight train pretty hard. 154 seems a reasonable estimate, as photographs add 5-10lbs depending on the angle.

p.s. @ Franck: You’re girlfriend would be thrilled to read your comment. : /

i don’t think that 5ft7 and 110 lbs is too skinny. people get upset when women are called too fat, and it is just as upsetting to hear that 5ft7 and 110 is too skinny or looks like a corpse! I happen to be 5ft7 and i am 108. my measurements are 37, 23, 33. i am a 32dd. (yes, they are real.) that’s not too skinny. i do not have an eating disorder, i do not diet, i do not work out at all, and i do NOT look like a corpse.

Women distribute weight very differently. Women can gain weight in the most awkward places. We can actually gain weight in our feet. Every woman’s body is different. Muscle weighs more than fat, that also needs to be considered. She places her weight very well and only just started working out with regularity. Being 5’10″ and a variety of different weights my whole life, I would put her about 160lbs, give or take 5lbs. There are so many variables, such as density of breast tissue, muscle mass, and things like that, but I wouldn’t put her at more than 165lbs or much less than 155lbs.

Of course, Katie, and there are no dogs on the Internet.

Who cares about the weight… as far as I am concerned, a woman is the 8th wonder of the world. Can you honesty see man creating anything better than the woman.

i’m 5’9 and 165 lbs. and i’m nowhere near to her. my measurements are 38-28-38 and i wear size 6-8. she is beautiful and so curvy, i think she is more likely 170 lbs. but she is nowhere near FAT.

I think 154lbs is spot on. I am 5’10 and have a very, very similar body to Ms. Christina. My weight and measurements have fluctuated over the years, but usually between 150lbs-160lbs, measurements 40-26-38, 36 DD. I consider myself to be in pretty good shape. This is probably wrong to say, but looking at her makes me feel really good about myself- sometimes you feel bigger than everyone else (probably because I like to wear heels everywhere). I like the way hollywood bodies are starting to trend.

Ok, so I am taking a different approach to this. We know she was a model, and was told to loose weight. she was 5’8″ and a size 4. (Ref: http://www.harpersbazaar.com/magazine/cover/christina-hendricks-interview) She was modeling dresses -so she was a fashion size bmi, not bikini/men’s mag. bmi (fashion models are slimmer and have a lower bmi) BUT she was perceived as being a little large and asked to loose weight. So a good guess for her modeling bmi is around 18, putting her modeling weight at around 118 lbs. She says since her modeling days she has gained 20 lbs, so her current weight would be around 138. This would give her the same BMI as Marlyne Monroe during her heavier period- and, as is referenced in the show she is supposed to be cast as that ‘type’.
I think one of the reasons her weight is not available is because part of her marketing is the ‘curvy’ appeal, and people would feel less akin to her if she was outed as still having a lower weight than the people that self identify with her. she appears bigger than she is because of all the boob, but look at her arms, waist, and hips, she is fairly slim. Big for Hollywood, but not for the real world. She is far slimmer than I, and I am curvy and tall, at 6′ I weigh 170. I measure 40-30-41, and wear a size 10 or 12. My cup size is a D or DD depending on the brand, I think she’s an F or larger.
ALSO, from the dress size measurements that yield a 30″ waist for her- remember that girdles and the like can actually increase measure’s because there are additional layers under the clothes (slip, girdle). The girdle firms and smooths, but doesn’t take much off in measure. It’s safe to say she has a waist of less than 30″.

I think yes, she does weigh 154 if not 150, I am 5’8″, and 15o lbs I think my body is very similar to hers her waist is a bit smaller and my hips are smaller than hers so it evens out. I’m a 36DD 29′waist, so I think she’s probably 26′, and 38′ hips so she’s probably 40′. but I think she is fine I don’t think she’s fat at all. Like Meh said put her in the real world she would be considered curvy. And don’t forget the camera adds weight!! I’m talking about red carpet pics not magazine pics because those are obviously photoshopped!!!

First of all, whoever said Marilyn Monroe was a size 14 is wrong. She wore a 14 in VINTAGE clothing. Which equates to about an 8.

Now, regarding Christina. She is not 165, not 175, not 200 lbs. I don’t care what your stats are, you may be more muscular and therefore weighing in more than her at a smaller size.

She is not tremendously muscular or all that toned. She appears to be roughly 37-30-37. I would put her at 145 lbs and a dress size 8. Also if you’re viewing her on Mad Men on a widescreen telly you’re going to have to realize that it adds 30 lbs. In pictures 10 lbs.

Have you seen her ad for London Fog? Or her latest article in InStyle mag? She clearly is not 180 lbs.

Weight means very little however in terms of size. I’ve weighed 135 and been in a size 10 due to lack of muscle and 155 in a size 6 when I was fit.

She’s a size 8-10.

I am 5’4″. My normal weight is around 120 lb and that is
“slender”, not “skinny”. Because of my small bones, I wear a size 2 in slacks, but an 8 blouse. I can’t wear a one piece dress because I lack a standardized body size and I don’t know a single woman who does. I used to make my work clothes so that I could make the necessary adjustments. Currently, a medication faux pas caused me to ball0on to 170 lb. My measurements were approximately 39-33-39. I looked disgusting. I have tiny bones; a bird-like frame. I am back to 135 lb now, still overweight for me, but more normal looking. At this weight, still overweight for me, I measure approximately 36-30-34. I’m wearing size 2 and size 4 slacks, depending on the cut, and still a size 8 blouse.

My point is that at 5’4″ and 170 lb with aforementioned measurements, I find it impossible to believe Ms. Hendricks could be 5″8″, 150 lb, with any of the guessed measurements. While her frame is not small, she’s not large boned, either.

At age 35, she would have to work out regularly to have a flat abdomen. Her upper arms would also have begun to take on the bane of middle aged women everywhere: larger girth and sagging triceps. She does not have the appearance of a toned woman who works out.

At 5’8″, her weight must be at least 170 lb and her famous “shape” assisted with helpful undergarments such as women wore when an hourglass figure was de rigeur. The interest in her weight and measurements must be the result of a society that has allowed a stick thin woman with a large chest and small waist to become the desired body type. The large chest is rarely “real” on a stick thin body since a “bust” is created from fat and the small waist is probably acquired from hours at the gym. Since a celebrity’s paycheck depends upon her ability to maintain this body shape, she’s going to do what she has to do to keep it, including surgery. The fascination with Ms. Hendricks’ “womanly” body is its deviation from the current “norm”. Watching old movies will show the changes in the most desirable woman’s body shape over the past century and drawings as well as old photographs will display the Gibson Girl type, of which Ms. Hendricks is most close. The Gibson Girl did not have that body type w/o extreme shaping undergarments, such as a tightly laced corset which created permanent deformity of the rib cage, as well as miscarriages and birth deformities. Whether you go with the extreme anorexic look of this era or the “hourglass” of the turn of the 20th century, neither truly represent the shape of a woman’s natural body sans shaping garments. Weight and time spent working out, whether at a gym or working with farm equipment, has much to do with a natural shape.

I would no more want Ms. Hendricks’ body shape to become desirable than I appreciate the anorexic androgynous body type. Neither are healthy or normal. Women would do themselves an enormous favor is they would embrace and promote the desirability of a healthy weight and a toned body. Both lead to a longer life via healthy eating habits and exercise. Ms. Hendricks’ is being turned into a freak show, a la a young Kate Moss or Twiggy. The Western society is “sick” in this regard. Can it not “worship” normal and healthy?

idk how to guesstimate weight, but i knew a girl in highschool that had pretty much the same build, maybe not the chest size. she was pretty heavy into sports too. shes was 180. pretty good looking if you ask me.

I am a tall and curvy woman at 5′ 11″ and 160 lbs. I have also weighed 200 lbs and did not look fat. Taller women can get away with weighing more without actually looking like it. Like the previous comment, people absolutely cannot believe I weigh 160, but 160 lbs looks a lot different on a tall woman than say someone who is 5’4″. Since I have a slightly smaller frame than her, my guess is that she weighs about 170. I personally think she is the most stunning actress out there and personally I don’t think she would look nearly as sexy at 110 or 120 like a lot of actresses these days.

I am 5″8 and I weigh 70kg (154lbs). I have a 34E, my jeans say I have a 32 waist size. For the record, I am Belgian, so I’m not used to working with lbs or any other measurements you use. I haven’t really got a belly, my shirt size is usually a 36 (but this can vary up to 40 due to the big balcony on top…) I am quite muscular, so I do weigh more than the usual woman in my size. But anyway I do not think she weighs less than me. I think it might be somewhere in the range Hailey said. I agree that many women lie about there actual weight and it is a shame. What’s to be ashamed about? A figure on a scale? What really matters is how you feel in your body. If you are happy, does it matter what the scales say? BMI is very effective, but it might also make people think they are fat when they aren’t. I have a BMI of 23,4 and if I should believe some people, I should be losing weight. But as I mentioned before: I do not (or barely) have a belly! So please, everyone. Do not stress out because of weight. And certainly do not compare your weight to someone else’s, it has no point but making you feel bad.

Look to the “FireFly” episode “Our Mrs Reynolds” Mal’s payment for a Past Job = Safron I believe is her character’s name she neither looks “tiny” nor “normal” I believe most of you are correct in assuming that they hide her actual weight so those of us who would love to believe that she is “bigger” Curvy” etc can delude ourselves into believing that she is just that a lovely “larger gal” I believe the truth that she is blessed Yes, blessed with some natural “gifts” that the rest of us can discuss till blue in the face. All I can say is the guessing continues…..

Quote: Don Draper August 3, 2010 at 7:26 am
I’m an expert on female weight and I can tell you that Hendricks is about 5’7″ and weighs under a 150lbs. And Hendricks is no more than a 38d (which is big)

And Hailey, at 5’9″ and 180lbs you are obese. My gf is that height and she weighs 130lbs and is about a 35 b or c Two other friends are 5’7″ and are 110lbs and they look perfectly healthy and female.

Sorry, I laughed so hard at this little tidbit. Every by of information in this is incorrect. As someone said before–and I just HAVE to reiterate this–5’9″ 180lbs is slightly overweight, not obese (BMI). And 5’7″ at 110lbs is in the underweight range.

Thirdly, though… I don’t think 35b is an actual available bra size! Unless your gf is getting tailor-made bras somewhere!

Female weight AND bra expert, indeed! lol

I have the same measurements, except I’m 5′ 2″. I would suspect that though her breasts look larger than mine in the clothes she wears, we are also similar in cup size (myself wearing a 32 F). I weigh 145, so at 5′ 8″ that would put her at… 170? Though lean she doesn’t look particularly ripped in the arms or anything, so this could be lower. But I’d say right around there! So glad I stumbled upon this website and got to know more about her! She’s absolutely stunning, and makes me proud to be a curvy girl! With people defining “curvy” as girls like Christina Aguilera with 21 inch waists, it’s tough to keep it natural looking and still feel sexy!